top of page
Search

Navigating Planning Authority Objections: A Drainage Designer's Guide

  • martinyoung5
  • May 21
  • 2 min read

The Planning Permission Challenge

For anyone involved in property development across the UK, securing planning approval for drainage designs can be one of the most challenging aspects of the development process.




Common Planning Authority Objections

1. Insufficient SuDS Implementation

Planning authorities increasingly require sustainable drainage solutions that manage surface water runoff effectively. Common objections include:


  • Inadequate consideration of the SuDS hierarchy

  • Lack of detailed maintenance plans

  • Limited water quality improvement measures


Solution: Develop comprehensive SuDS designs that clearly demonstrate adherence to the hierarchy (infiltration, attenuation, controlled discharge). Include detailed maintenance schedules and responsibilities, and incorporate features that improve water quality such as filter strips or bioretention areas.


2. Technical Documentation Gaps

Planning authorities require thorough technical documentation to support drainage proposals. Frequent objections arise from:


  • Incomplete flood risk assessments

  • Missing or inadequate soakaway test results

  • Insufficient topographical survey information


Solution: Create a pre-submission checklist ensuring all technical requirements are met. Ensure topographical surveys are provided in both DWG and PDF format to OS National Grid standards. Conduct comprehensive soakaway tests following BRE 365 methodology and document results clearly.


3. Environmental Concerns

Environmental impact is a growing concern for planning authorities. Objections often focus on:


  • Potential impact on existing water systems

  • Groundwater contamination risks

  • Surface water management during extreme weather events


Solution: Incorporate evidence-based mitigation strategies that address local environmental policies. Design systems that protect groundwater quality and demonstrate resilience during extreme weather events through appropriate modelling.


Pre-Submission Best Practices

Based on our experience working with planning authorities across the UK, we've developed these pre-submission best practices:


  1. Early Engagement: Consult with planning authorities before formal submission to understand specific local requirements.

  2. Comprehensive Documentation: Ensure all technical documents are complete, including:

  3. Clear Presentation: Present calculations and methodologies in a clear, accessible format that non-technical planning officers can understand.

  4. Anticipate Questions: Prepare responses to likely queries about maintenance responsibilities, adoption arrangements, and long-term sustainability.


Case Study: Overcoming Complex Planning Objections

Recently, we worked with a housing developer facing multiple planning objections related to surface water management on a challenging site with high groundwater levels. By implementing an innovative combination of permeable paving, underground attenuation, and controlled discharge rates, we successfully addressed all planning concerns while maintaining the development's economic viability.

The key to success was our detailed technical documentation and clear demonstration of how our solution met both environmental requirements and practical maintenance considerations.


Conclusion

Successfully navigating planning authority objections requires a combination of technical expertise, thorough documentation, and strategic communication. At The Drainage Designers, we specialise in helping homeowners, architects, and developers overcome these challenges to secure planning approval for drainage designs.

Whether you're working on a residential extension, commercial development, or large-scale housing project, understanding common objections and implementing proven solutions will significantly improve your chances of planning success.

 
 
 

Comentarios


bottom of page